4 sources
Worth following for the evaluation side of alignment work, especially where model-written tests and more faithful reasoning traces are used to make model behavior easier to inspect.
Researcher Profile
Editor reviewedLiane Lovitt
Alignment via AI feedback (Constitutional AI)
Societal impacts and evaluation researcher at Anthropic
A good page for the societal-impacts side of Anthropic’s research, especially where evaluation work turns toward persuasion and real-world downstream effects.
Organizations
Anthropic
Labs
About This Page
This profile is meant to help you get oriented quickly: why this researcher matters, what to read first, and where to explore next.
Known For
The ideas, systems, and research directions that make this person worth knowing.
01
Model-written evaluations
02
Persuasiveness and societal-impact measurement
03
Alignment-oriented evaluation work
04
Alignment via AI feedback (Constitutional AI)
05
Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback
06
Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Start Here
Canonical papers, project pages, or repositories that anchor this profile.
Supporting Sources
Additional links that help verify and flesh out this profile.
Related Researchers
People worth exploring next because they share topics, labs, or source material with this profile.
5 sources
A strong person to follow for the evaluation-heavy side of Anthropic, especially where behavior discovery, reasoning faithfulness, and concrete safety testing come together.
5 sources
A strong person to follow for how Anthropic moved from assistant training into more explicit evaluation work around model behavior, red-teaming, and chain-of-thought faithfulness.
5 sources
Worth following for the evaluation side of Anthropic’s alignment program, especially where model-written tests and public-input methods become practical tooling rather than just ideas.
5 sources
One of the clearest people to follow if you care about scaling laws, training efficiency, and the systems choices that quietly shape frontier-model progress.
5 sources
A good person to follow for the part of alignment work that becomes concrete measurement: model-written tests, chain-of-thought faithfulness, and behavior-shaping methods that can actually be audited.